

2005
Plot: Fidelity, honesty, and personal responsibility jump the tracks.
We have more than usual to say about this one! Movies that make you talk—for good or bad—are sometimes the most interesting.
Eric: This movie succeeded on one level: it riveted me for the duration and caused a provocative discussion between Kelly and me that lasted long past our bedtime. Why is watching characters pile bad decision upon bad decision on top of moral failures so morbidly addicting? My adrenaline was pumping in a type of stress reaction as I wondered what consequences, if any, the main character would face. Kelly, to her credit, predicted the big surprise well in advance and didn’t accept the numerous logic flaws for a second. I appreciated this movie less the following morning. If only Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day could have captivated me this much.

Kelly: I have a strong distaste for movies where the main character puts innocent loved ones in jeopardy just to save face. There is a point (like when the bad guy is kissing your daughter) that it might be a good idea to go ahead and tell the truth! I’m just saying. I guess I could have gone along with the adventure and enjoyed the thrill of wondering how he was going to get out of the mess he created, but I didn’t care. He didn’t deserve revenge. I thought Jennifer Anniston’s character was robotic and a bit sad. Were we supposed to feel sorry for her? The logic didn’t really work; the “good” characters were just plain stupid; and I have yet to find a redeeming quality for anyone in the movie. It did spark a great conversation with Eric, though, and that might be worth placing it on your Netflix queue. I prefer Miss Pettigrew.
